Re: We're royally fucked -- It's Debateable

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3] ]

Subject: Re: We're royally fucked

Author:
Anne

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:52:45 06/29/02 Sat
In reply to: Maria 's message, "Re: We're royally fucked" on 11:51:23 06/29/02 Sat

>>I'm well aware of the Bill of Rights. But obviously
>>random drug testing remains within those rights,
>>because it's done everywhere you turn around nowadays.
>> My husband administers them regularly to his
>>employees.
>
>
>What kind of work do they do? Personally, I would
>prefer not work somewhere that required drug testing.
>I don't agree with it for people whose jobs don't
>involve taking on the responsibility for other
>people's saftey.

He is manager of a major plumbing/htg/ac wholesaler. It's not his policy, it's corporate policy. They also do those stupid personality tests before they hire anyone.

Most of the drug testing is for truck drivers. They have to pass DOT physicals and carry a CDL driver's license, so I guess that technically there is a safety factor involved. But none of the employees are exempt from a ramdom test. Including my husband.
>
>>I'm assuming we're talking about a urine test here,
>>not extensive blood work. I have no problem with my
>>kids being subjected to peeing in a cup every now and
>>then to test them.
>>
>That I would have a problem with, much more so than
>looking in a locker or backpack.

I can understand no one wanting their child subjected to it. I *personally* am just not totally opposed to it.

Anne

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: We're royally fucked	Siannach	13:47:36 07/01/02 Mon