Re: Controversial religious ruling -- It's Debateable

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3] ]

Subject: Re: Controversial religious ruling

Author:
Siannach

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:21:29 07/01/02 Mon
In reply to: Astrid 's message, "Re: Controversial religious ruling" on 17:38:53 06/28/02 Fri

>>That's particularly so in this case, where I don't see
>>the damage to non-deists. No one has to say the
>>pledge, in whole or in part. One doesn't even have to
>>stand out as a "protest" -- if you don't want to say
>>"under God", just DON'T DO IT.
>
As a "non-deist", I don't have a big problem with saying the word "god". I do it all the time without thinking about it when I say OMG, or god dammit, but when its required by official sources, it does make me somewhat uncomfortable. I like my church and state FAR apart.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]