VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:00:02 05/08/09 Fri
Author: Lee
Subject: consistency...
In reply to: Tina L 's message, "Re: DKH" on 18:26:10 05/08/09 Fri

A good dog won't look bad in a video, but a poor quality dog can look ok in pictures.

However, over time...only a great dog will consistently look great.

Gordo is a decent dog...and in some videos he looked good while in others he showed signs that were not ideal. Why...because a lot of video was made...and shared. The more video one shows, the more apparent a dog's qualities are.

Pictures are easier to fake than is video...that is IF ONE KNOWS WHAT TO LOOK FOR.

Also, video is also far more useful than are words alone.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.