VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2] ]
Subject: Re: 281CID 4.6L DOHC Cobra VS 289 CID High Performance


Author:
GrimpalaSS
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 21:35:52 05/11/03 Sun
In reply to: stang 's message, "Re: 281CID 4.6L DOHC Cobra VS 289 CID High Performance" on 10:32:18 12/05/02 Thu

BUZZ! GUYZ! no one is a homo but a FORD lover! Lt1 5.7 vs. the fucken 4.6!!!that's been around for years. first, the LT1 out performed the tiny 4.6 in lots of ways. its stronger and more reliable than ford's POS (piece of shit) 4.6.
No wonder they were used in caprices, comaros, corvettes, caddis and roadmasters. everyone loved them- from cops- to normal drivers.

have u ever driven a FORD latley? BUSSHH YEAH!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: 281CID 4.6L DOHC Cobra VS 289 CID High Performanceblake22:49:22 10/22/04 Fri


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.