Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

Subject: Re: Imperial fleet Vs Federation fleet Author: Warspite [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 08:51:38 10/02/02 Wed Author Host/IP: ipd54b1d20.free.wxs.nl/213.75.29.32 In reply to: capn hayes 's message, "Re: Imperial fleet Vs Federation fleet" on 13:45:09 10/01/02 Tue >>>Oh for pete's sake. THIS AGAIN??? Look, let me help >>>you out here since you're obviously struggling to >>>understand the info. Look at that nice picture you >>>mention on page 88. Yes there are the five "nested >low >>>level deflector shields", but do you also notice the >>>other beam shooting out well ahead of them? It is >>>labeled "Macroscopic object deflected by active >>>deflector beam"? >> >>Just for everyones benefit, you can now see this >>picture at:- >> >>http://www.angelfire.com/empire/blueyard/STvSW.html >> >>It under "The targeting argument" section. > > >oh so now websites that use material from the TM can >be used as canon info, just not the book it's from. Oh this is hilarious. YOU came up with the diagram to attempt to prove me wrong, but when I used it to show that you ARE wrong, you suddenly start complaining that its not canon. Well I'm sorry you feel that life is so unfair. If you don't accept the TMs that is fine by me, but don't try to use them to prove your arguments. If you do accept and use them, then don't whine when other people use them too. I have NEVER said that the TMs cannot be used in these debates. In fact I have stated as number of times to you that you CAN use them. This tactic is not what I have come to expect from you. Your debating level is normally very good! [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]