Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

Subject: Re: star wars vs. star trek tech. 2 Author: WarsGOD [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 04:56:52 08/27/02 Tue Author Host/IP: NoHost/207.14.48.2 In reply to: TrekGOD 's message, "Re: star wars vs. star trek tech. 2" on 04:49:29 08/27/02 Tue >>You are mistake in several places. First, your vanted >>matter-anti-matter reactor is sufficiently powerfull >>to operate that warp drive thing of yours. Big deal, >>the massive fusion plant on a star destroyer puts off >>enough energy to be mistaken as a star (but no-one >>makes that mistake because sensors show the powersorce >>to be a comparitively small ship). >> >>Hyperspace motivators of Star Wars are much faster >>than your warp engines. 75 years to get to the >>alpha-quadrant? A star Destroyer can make it from the >>galactic core to the outer rim in a week! And that's a >>slow ship! >> >>You ask us why we haven't unified our galaxy?! You >>haven't unified your quadrant! >> >>People of Star Wars can contact eachother from accross >>the Galaxy in truly realtime conversations. But you >>have lag in Star Trek, and can't comunitcate to other >>parts of the galaxy w/out a vast and easily damaged >>relay network. >> >>Let's face facts, Star Trek tech, is nowhere near Star >>Wars tech. It's left behind, hopelessly wallowing in >>the dust. Where the militaries of Star Wars to come >>to blows with those of Star Trek, the Federation and >>all of it's allies and enemies would be dispatched >>with frightening ease. > >A more dramatic definition of what I said.. Divine Shadow you speak with the passion of a Sith lord. WarsGOD blesses you. Remember Anger, Fear, Hatred, MMMM powerful they make you [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Re: star wars vs. star trek tech. 2 The Divine Shadow 05:01:56 08/27/02 Tue