VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4] ]
Subject: Re: Phasers vs. Blasters


Author:
trekie
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 04:14:17 08/28/02 Wed
Author Host/IP: NoHost/65.163.170.99
In reply to: WarsGOD 's message, "Re: Phasers vs. Blasters" on 03:10:06 08/28/02 Wed

>>you got that right, I don't trust Ewoks either and a
>>series being offsprung by movies??? never did like
>>that idea whereas a move being offsprung by a TV show,
>> now that is acceptable in my book. Just like
>>StarGate and SG1, they didn't even use the people in
>>the movie in the TV show.
>SILENCE!!! Puny trek weaklings. WarsGOD tires of
>listening to your childish critisim about the
>difference betwen movies and TV shows. The point was
>which is more powerful phasrs or blasters. In this
>contest Phasers do seem on average to be slightly
>inferior to Blasters. Phasers are designed to
>Starfleet's policy of being defensive and passive, so
>they want their weapons to look non-threatening. As a
>side effect the are awkward. The rifles do apear more
>soldier freindly like blasters, even firing bolts. If
>firepower is the question Blasters are equal to
>phasers. This has been seen in various examples. Since
>Lucas wrote those crapy Ewok movies the should be
>condsidered canon sources. Even if they sucked as
>entertainment. As far as their utility is concerned
>Blasters do seem to be better than phasers and more
>durable to I can't see Khan crushing a blaster in his
>hand. See "Space Seed" TOS.

since they don't seem threating, the person carrying it can be more devious.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: Phasers vs. BlastersWarsGOD13:35:10 08/28/02 Wed


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+1
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.