VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:00:25 07/24/02 Wed
Author: kent #22
Author Host/IP: dhcp065-025-059-060.neo.rr.com / 65.25.59.60
Subject: Re: someone's got some hometown sizes down
In reply to: the mack daddy 's message, "someone's got some hometown sizes down" on 11:44:00 07/24/02 Wed

>>well stephan sanders was second team last year same
>>diley? and wynek was too and he was only a sophmore?
>>so sanders is better then fat asss bane....and jon
>>long is a d1 prospect looking at purdue? 6'4 240
>>sander 6'4 260 and wyanek or however u spill the shit
>>had a good numbers but he must be better then those
>>other 100 guys u named...and im from falls by the way
>>and my mvp for this year on d...SAMPSON! not fatass
>>bane or super tough redneck from tenn or dildo
>>dailey/...
>
>there is no way that either of those guys are 6'4",
>last year they were 6'1" at largest. they were small.
> and if they weight 240 or 260 then they must have
>gotten a lot fatter than last year, our team's
>offensive line rolled through them for about 400 yards
>rushing in the first half alone.
>
>also watch what you say about bane, he's no fatter
>than sampson (sampson is like 5'11" 300, bane is 6'2"
>290). also bane will be playing on a much better team
>than ravenna or falls and he will be a big
>contributor, who cares what you say.
>
>and dailey graduated you moron.


ravenna d-line was ummm decent size...but burks is big...sampson is big...bane is alright i played ball with him...move nice for a big guy...sanders is overated by far...gordon is tough for a forsh..wanyek...he is 6'4 but not 260 maybe 225 if that...but all theses guys are goos except sanders give them credit and do the talking with bads

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-11
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.