VoyUser Login optional ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678[9] ]
Subject: Rex Paki's Professionalism Gives Bad name to Engan Up and coming Professionals

Disgusted Engan
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: Tue, Nov 29 2005, 03:57:59pm

PAC gagged!
Court order violates independence of Parliament, says PAC

MEMBERS of the Parliamentary Public Accounts Committee (PAC) expressed anger yesterday when a court order was taken out to prevent them from inquiring into aspects of a report on the Public Curators Office which concerned Rex Paki and his company RAMS Business Consultants.
The report which the PAC was looking into was prepared by the Auditor General’s office.

Mr Paki took out the order, dated Nov 25, 2005, to gag the PAC, claiming he was not given enough time to respond to the report, and the summons to appear.

Angry members of the PAC learnt of the court order during a scheduled hearing in Parliament yesterday, and described it as an attempt by the judiciary to intrude into the work of the legislative arm of government. PAC chairman John Hickey and member Dr Alan Marat were visibly upset not only because of the order, but also because it was served on the PAC within the precincts of Parliament, apparently with little regard for parliamentary privilege and procedures.

PAC Secretariat officials said the person who delivered the order just escaped being arrested and charged for breaching parliamentary privilege and procedures. Mr Hickey said: “This committee does not consider that the National Court has any jurisdiction over its activity and has referred the matter to the legal advisors to dissolve the order forthwith this (Tuesday) morning.”
To Mr Paki, Mr Hickey said: “He thinks he can control Parliament.”

Dr Marat, a lawyer by profession, said the PAC was inquiring into the Public Curator’s Office, not into Rex Paki or his company, Ram Business Consultants. He said the committee has not received the order, and it takes it that it is not bound by any order. “It’s a very important point on the issue of the independence of the three arms of government. The PAC is a parliamentary committee and the order that you heard about is like ordering the Parliament not to conduct any inquiries into the Public Curator’s Office which is a proper function of the PAC.

“This committee feels that it has every right to proceed with the inquiry regardless of this order that is floating around somewhere,” Dr Marat said.

Officers of the PAC Secretariat said the order was served to the office when the session was already in progress in the B2 Conference Room in Parliament, and they had to advice members of the order. The PAC adjourned the inquiry to Feb 17, 2006. Before the inquiry adjourned, Mr Hickey said Mr Paki had communicated with him in writing on two occasions which he responded by saying the inquiry was specifically into the office of the Public Curator. He told the inquiry that Ram Business Consultant was appointed agent of the Public Curator some years back and a mention of this was contained in the report of the AG.
“I said to him that the committee will be willing for him to provide a reply to those areas of the report where Ram is objecting to.

“I than said to him that his response should be received by the committee before Thursday, 4pm, Nov 24, 2005. But Mr Paki has seen fit to go to court to seek orders. Those orders have not been served on us and at this stage we take those orders as absolute hearsay,” Mr Hickey said.
He said the Auditor General’s Office and his committee have advised Mr Paki and Ram Business Consultants to respond to the report or to be heard by the committee and that invitation remained open.



Mr. Paki has been on the news about many allegations (either proven or otherwise). It's appears to be a repeated trend and he as a professional is on the headlines for the wrong reasons again.

One would wonder if they've ever taken any dose of ethics, integrity and morality in so far as discharging of professional duties is concerned.

This doesn't help us, the up and coming Engan professionals in our bid to secure competitive job offers because there's a glaring stigma associated to the Enga name in the professional world.

Can we have some humility and do our job with respect for established laws of this land? These "get rich quick ploys" are not good for a better educated Engan community in all works of life in PNG and elsewhere.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[> Subject: To me, I think the culprit Mr. Paki "Stinks" to be seen as an Engan

True Professional Engan
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Mon, Dec 05 2005, 12:10:37pm

This guys "stinks" to be dubbed as an "engan professional". Let alone, he's a crook in the eyes of the public.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: To me, I think the culprit Mr. Paki "Stinks" to be seen as an Engan

Annoyed by corrupt bodies
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Thu, Dec 08 2005, 03:53:03pm

True dat,
This guy smells corruption and foul play everywhere he put his fingers to.

Wonder why PNG Accountant's Body allow this person to go on like this without de-registering him as an account?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: Rex Paki's Professionalism Gives Bad name to Engan Up and coming Professionals

Another professional Engan
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Wed, Dec 07 2005, 08:46:45am

Yes, too true. Such crooks are sad reflection of those that have not fully grown up. They just care about themselves

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: Rex Paki's Professionalism Gives Bad name to Engan Up and coming Professionals

Could He Be Clean? (Have we mistaken?)
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: Mon, Jan 08 2007, 12:15:37am

I share similar sentiments with "True" and "Another Professional" and the "Annoyed" as far as our Engan image is concerned. But you fellas were too quick in opening your your mouths and shooting at one of your colleagues and Engas True National leader in the accounting profession. As such you also failed to demonstrate the "professionalism" you claim to profess. Could it be that you Charged at him for other reasons? Is this professional jealousy or something? Or just Engan politics? If you are who you claim, then Kaims proof your worth. See if you can exceed the preformance, professionalism, and remarkable ahievement Mr Paki has attained in the accounting arena - One of the top and brilliant accountants, a fortright leader in liquidation, one of the only few "fellows" in the accounting body! Besides, thus far none of the claims against him has been proven. Commarades....let the Engan spirit live on!!!

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]

VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
* Message subject (required):

* Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:

Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

Forum timezone: GMT+10
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2017 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.