Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct:
Feedback:
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ] |
| Subject: Re: research questions for Duffo---1/1/03--Stevo mor abnormal which is good | |
|
Author: No name |
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 03:21:38 01/01/03 Wed In reply to: 's message, "Re: research questions for Duffo---1/1/03--Stevo" on 23:04:33 12/31/02 Tue I think they have to actually have to abnormal notr extraordinary---which is a positive, you have two groups of people--stockmarket analysts and Accountants---stockmarket analysts don't think much of abnormals---but accountants do--and for purposes of valuation the stockmarket goes on the accountants view. Anyway with Sean, I'm going to clarify all these matters and get an answer--then I can post the lot as facts. Stevo [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
| Subject | Author | Date |
| Re: no other way round--abnormals I think (recurring transactions) check today with Duffo | No name | 18:31:33 01/01/03 Wed |
|
||