Marlan's felony was section 342 not 324 -- WLouisHennessy.com

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 03:58:53 09/20/02 Fri
Author: Mike
Author Host/IP: pcp318515pcs.waldrf01.md.comcast.net / 68.48.3.4
Subject: Marlan's felony was section 342 not 324
In reply to: Mike 's message, "BAD NEWS MARLAN IS A FELON" on 20:28:57 09/19/02 Thu

I looked it up on the internet Marlan Deen plead guilty to section 342 not 324 which is theft over 300 dollars. Thanks.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> Reply to Mike -- W. Louis Hennessy, 06:08:20 09/20/02 Fri (cache-mtc-ac09.proxy.aol.com/64.12.96.78)

I stand corrected. However consider the following. My opponent made a lot of noise about my association with Mr. Deen. "It's troubling for a candidate for state's attorney to make political allies of convicted criminals,..." What is disingeneous is that my opponent had a repeat offender attended a fundraiser for him this summer. What is worse is that the repeat offender had another criminal trial pending at the time. If it is troubling for a candidate for state's attorney to associate with criminals, how does that bode for the sitting state's attorney. Not to mention the hypocrisy of my opponent's statements.

Be that as it may, both our supporters are trying to put their problems behind them. They both are obviously interested in the political process. Given the low voter turnout in the County in the recent primary election (one of the lowest in the State) they should be commended, not ridiculed.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]