VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2] ]
Subject: The Hooded Angels: the Bad


Author:
BoyScoutKevin
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 14:23:26 11/02/03 Sun

What was bad about the movie?

The acting was bad. No one acted like that in those days.

The costumes were bad. No one dressed like that in those days.

The sets were bad. No one lived in towns that looked like that in those days.

The writing was bad. No one talked like that in those days.

Which means the directing was bad. (IMHO)

Until next time and "The Hooded Angels: the Ugly." Enjoy!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.