Of course i will not comment on what says someone like you who considers archeology a "100% pure objectiveand acurate science". -- CHADI'S FORUM

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Wednesday 24 [ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Of course i will not comment on what says someone like you who considers archeology a "100% pure objectiveand acurate science".

Author:
chadi
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 21:05:54 12/02/02 Mon
In reply to: Grad student in anthropology 's message, "You will not comment because you do not have the actual scientific facts to back it up. The fact is you don't know." on 20:51:42 12/02/02 Mon

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date

1. I was coming from a physical anthropological point of view, not archaeoligical. Although both are subfields of anthropology, what they deal with may or may not overlap. 2. Cannibalistic tribes are/were only those that ate a PART of the human body from an enemy, their diet did not even consist 1% human. Grad student in anthropology 18:29:57 12/03/02 Tue

Also, post-processualism in archaeology has shown that archaeology is not 100% objective. Read up on history of theory of archaeology before you comment on something else you know nothing about. Might I suggest "History of Archaeological Thought" by Bruce Trigger? Grad student in anthropology 18:38:57 12/03/02 Tue