Re: Age aint nothin but a number -- Sociology 3151 Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:26:12 04/28/05 Thu
Author: Rett Rogers
Subject: Re: Age aint nothin but a number
In reply to: Kim Herman 's message, "Age aint nothin but a number" on 10:03:43 04/28/05 Thu

I feel that age is something that should be considered in society. The mandolinists also commented that age was an advantage at times in terms of being noticed withing the bluegrass community. Although this is true , their talent is something that speaks louder. I feel that even if these fellas were not so young that they would still be well known within the bluegrass community of the Front Range. Although there identities are partially constructed by their age, their talent plays a larger role.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Age aint nothin but a number -- Tiffany Barnett, 19:33:01 04/29/05 Fri