Re: Universal winger discussion -- Great White Rumour Mill

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3] ]

Subject: Re: Universal winger discussion

Author:
Knifed

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:59:56 09/18/02 Wed
In reply to: Stephen 's message, "Re: Universal winger discussion" on 21:41:05 09/18/02 Wed

Just for LWers or for all forwards?

>As we have it now you can only change a position in
>the off-season or when someone is traded and only if
>that trade affects said position. This is something I
>would like to keep.
>
>Basically the question for me is about correcting the
>imbalance between LW and RW. Dean had a pretty good
>idea in that you either keep a player presently listed
>as a LW as a LW or you take his new position(s) as
>listed in the Forecaster. However, should you opt for
>the latter, you can not later go back to LW. What does
>everyone think of adopting this?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: Universal winger discussion	Saskatoon	09:56:40 09/19/02 Thu

Re: Universal winger discussion	Stephen	15:08:46 09/19/02 Thu