Re: Universal winger discussion -- Great White Rumour Mill

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3] ]

Subject: Re: Universal winger discussion

Author:
Stephen

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:47:07 09/20/02 Fri
In reply to: Stephen 's message, "Universal winger discussion" on 21:54:43 09/16/02 Mon

So far we've got 6 people involved in this conversation, not including myself. I'd like to hear what others have to say about this. First off, the fact that you can only change positions during the off-season and if a trade affecting said position is made WILL NOT change. That will remain. The question though remains of how to address the LW/RW imbalance in the Forecaster's positionings because let's face it, we do not use players making up the bottom third of the NHL. Universal winger was meant to take into account the position changing rules as stated in this message. The only thing this was supposed to affect is that you could at the beginning of the season or after a trade was made move your wingers around if the trade reflected that you needed to.

We've had two suggestions so far. One is allowing those players solely designated RW to play LW as well. The other is a reduncancy rule which would allow those who already play LW to stay there provided the GM doesn't move them positionally.

I'd like to hear what people have to say about these two suggestions.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: Universal winger discussion	Saskatoon	17:20:37 09/20/02 Fri