VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2] ]
Subject: Re: Assignment #3


Author:
Nelson Moore
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 13:27:48 06/23/10 Wed
In reply to: Kelly Hanks 's message, "Re: Assignment #3" on 14:46:53 06/20/10 Sun

Your post response shows the problems with too many variables that can affect the scores of all these tests. For an accurate assessment, I believe one has to be in top shape prior to taking the test. Perhaps they should only be done around nine, after one's had breakfast and mind at ease for a maximum score.


>>Assignment 3 (Intelligence):
>Pretest Taking:
>I think IQ testing can be very useful; however, I have
>not had much experience with them. I have not
>personally taken an IQ test that I can recall, but one
>way IQ testing affects me is at work. I work with two
>different cottages at a residential campus. One of my
>cottages houses normal functioning youth and the other
>houses youth whom IQ are 70 and under. These youth
>are known as intellectual disadvantaged. It is
>imperative to know their level of functioning in order
>to effectively work with the youth. Their treatment
>looks different compared to others on the campus. The
>treatment work is geared towards a lower level of
>functioning so they can understand and effectively
>work through treatment. The IQ testing has also
>proven effective for the staff members whom work with
>the lower functioning youth because they are able to
>prepare themselves and receive training on how to
>effectively communicate and work with the youth.
>Therefore, IQ testing has been beneficial in working
>with the youth in my cottages. IQ testing is
>beneficial in other areas as well, such as placement
>in school.
>I am unsure about how I feel about actually taking an
>IQ test. I do not know what to expect and/or how a
>test is given. If it is standardized, I will probably
>be more nervous, which can affect my score. Also, I
>am nervous to find out what my score is because I do
>not want it to be too low, therefore, I feel some
>pressure in that respect. I will predict my score to
>be about average.
>
>Post Test Taking:
> I like 2 out of the 3 of the tests I took. The first
>Classical IQ test got really long and really boring
>after a while. I felt like I was back in grade
>school. Most of the questions were pretty decent.
>There were some verbal questions in which there were
>some words I absolutely did not have any idea what
>they were. They reminded me of the classic SAT or GRE
>questions. That had to be the most challenging part
>of the first test for me. Overall I did not really
>like taking this test because I felt like it was very
>long and it made me tired. Becoming exhausted while
>taking a test more than likely has a negative
>correlation to test taking. I am not saying that I
>did not score well, my score was average. I am saying
>that the test seemed too lengthy.
>I did like the Culture-fair IQ test. There were only
>20 questions during this test and the test kept me
>entertained. For some reason I felt like I was
>competing against myself. I did not want to rush
>through it because I liked the challenging aspect.
>During the first test, I just felt defeated if I did
>not know the answer. With the second test I felt like
>if I really tried I would be able to answer correctly,
>I would just have to critically think more. There are
>pros and cons to test like this, however. For people
>like me whom like to challenge themselves and not give
>up this test is a good predictor of their knowledge in
>the area. However, there are people whom do not have
>a lot of patience and would rather give up then
>critical think. For those people this instrument may
>not be as valid. I do not believe that is to say
>those people are any less intelligent than another. I
>think people’s interest can sway their results and
>that has nothing to do with their intelligence.
>The final test on Emotional Intelligence was also
>long; however, it kept me engaged because it is
>something I am interested in. I have a strong
>emotional intelligence which probably contributes to
>my passion of counseling and helping others. Being a
>counselor and working with people has an impact on my
>emotional intelligence as well. I scored rather high
>on this test which makes me feel good and attributes
>to my competence in my work with others. Overall I
>liked this test and felt it was a good measurement of
>my emotional intelligence.
>Overall, I think that all the tests scored me
>accurately. The results affirm what I feel to be a
>pretty close measurement of my intelligence.
>Therefore, the results give me a feeling of
>contentment. I was worried I was going to score low
>and feel ashamed. However, I am pretty satisfied with
>my scores.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-6
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.