[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement:
Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor
of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users'
privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your
privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket
to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we
also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.
Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
[ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 10:50:25 02/02/04 Mon
Author: Lethal Larry
Author Host/IP: px2wh.vc.shawcable.net / 24.69.255.203
Subject: Careful. You're asking for things you don't want to hear.
In reply to:
Hero of Time
's message, "And your proof? You'll need more than "Because.....because Bush is a...um.......a WARMONGER! Yeah that's it!"" on 17:26:04 02/01/04 Sun
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Replies:
[> [> [> [> [>
"Discussion of controversial issues is welcomed; while posting facts is perfectly acceptable, posting inflammatory or insulting opinions may be considered abuse by the forum moderator..." -- Hero of Time, 16:47:37 02/02/04 Mon (68-119-244-175-rcp2.ubr1.wrbg.mo.charter.com/68.119.244.175)
I'm following your own rules here. Aren't I a nice guy?
However, I'm wanting CREDIBLE proof, not hyped-Moore-Hatred or DU rants. I'm talking FoxNews or something that I personally trust. There's a lot of bullshit out there. Even Senator Kerry calls the "Bush knew about 9/11" concept complete bullshit, and he's running for presidency.
You guys get on me about being blind.....well, here's my attempt to turn over a new leaf, or so. I just don't ever buy hatred...it's got to be credible.
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [>
My point is that the conversation is again turning to subjects in which, if I were to participate, I'd likely end up yielding opinions that have nothing to do with you, yet you'll take it personally. -- Lethal Larry, 18:24:00 02/02/04 Mon (px2wh.vc.shawcable.net/24.69.255.203)
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Oh, they'd have everything to do with me, and we both know it. That'd usually be ok, but we tend to drag everyone else into it as well. -- Hero of Time, 05:07:27 02/03/04 Tue (68-119-244-175-rcp2.ubr1.wrbg.mo.charter.com/68.119.244.175)
Besides which, yielding opinions, as you say, violate your own rules: 'posting inflammatory or insulting opinions may be considered abuse'.
Furthermore, I already stated more than once that opinion will never change my view, only true, credible, God's truth facts, and therefore, I just won't care to take anyone's opinion on the matter to heart.
So yeah.
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [>
Nope. I don't think there will be much trouble.... -- Robert, 07:38:09 02/05/04 Thu (host093025.phil.uni-erlangen.de/131.188.93.25)
except maybe a little bit in between just for for fun. *L*
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [>
and additionally Shaun addressed himself as 'moderate' in an above post just noticed it - I never had problems with moderates.... :) -- Robert, 09:02:24 02/05/04 Thu (host093025.phil.uni-erlangen.de/131.188.93.25)
though the moderates I had to deal with until now were slightly different. *L*
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [>
I did NOT address myself as a moderate. I said "I think what'd really turn a lot of moderates' heads, as well as my own". "As well as" meant "in addition too". -- Heroic Conservative, 17:33:34 02/05/04 Thu (68-119-244-175-rcp2.ubr1.wrbg.mo.charter.com/68.119.244.175)
Though I can see how you'd see myself saying I'm a moderate...my bad.
But no, I'm a conservative. I'm not Republican, as I don't pay dues to the party (fuck that), but my personal values and beliefs and whatnot end up matching nicely with the conservative thinking.
*Devours Robert*
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Are you registered as a Republican, an Independent, or something else I didn't think of? -- Joe Taylor, 22:54:08 02/05/04 Thu (wc03.wlfdle.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com/66.185.84.70)
I'm registered as an Independent because I loathe the Democratic party, but I'd register as a Democrat if I had to do so in order to vote in the Dem primary. And now it seems that I won't even vote in that primary...
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
.....I just said I'm not registered to ANYTHING. I'm not registered to vote yet, if that's what you're meaning. -- Hero of Time, 04:30:56 02/06/04 Fri (68-119-244-175-rcp2.ubr1.wrbg.mo.charter.com/68.119.244.175)
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
This accounts for the difference - I was slightly pussled, but then again I thought it might be a new sort. -- Robert, 14:14:37 02/06/04 Fri (host093025.phil.uni-erlangen.de/131.188.93.25)
*L*
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
pussled = puzzled -- Auto-Correct Feature, 17:11:36 02/06/04 Fri (68-119-244-175-rcp2.ubr1.wrbg.mo.charter.com/68.119.244.175)
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
You're a pussy. :) -- Robert, 09:09:23 02/07/04 Sat (host093025.phil.uni-erlangen.de/131.188.93.25)
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Fuck you, cunt. -- Auto-Vulgarity Feature, 14:56:19 02/07/04 Sat (68-119-244-175-rcp2.ubr1.wrbg.mo.charter.com/68.119.244.175)
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Shouldn't this be Auto-Fuck Feature? -- Robert, 15:22:20 02/07/04 Sat (host093025.phil.uni-erlangen.de/131.188.93.25)
[ Edit | View ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]
Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
