VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Tuesday, July 08, 07:52:04 GMT-4
Author: Jay
Subject: Re: Ghost are fake
In reply to: Rico 's message, "Re: Ghost are fake" on Monday, June 03, 05:21:52 GMT-4

The evidence for 'ghosts' is actually very strong. Many millions of sightings and experiences by people who can be trusted. However, to say that 'ghosts' are all the same would be somewhat naive and short sighted. The mere term 'ghost' means a faint trace... not necessarily the conscious reappearance of a long dead person or animal. In that respect the ghost doesn't physically exist, but that doesn't mean that you can't see, hear or feel its presence.

My own personal theory is that most people will have seen a ghost, but unless that ghost was dressed radically differently to you, or it was in a scanario or acting in a way that would make it stand out, you would never know whether it was a ghost or a real human being / animal.

The reason why most ghost sightings are reported at quiet times (at night or in deserted areas) are because we can count out any other outside activity as being the cause for the sighting.

The originator of this thread has most likely experienced something but has not been open minded enough to realise it or was simply not in a situation where another supposedly logical explanation could be given to it.

As for the luanr landings... I agree that it's a case of rather well staged one-upmanship for the US. There's more evidence to prove that it didn't happen as claimed than to prove catagorically that it did!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.