VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 17:15:03 03/09/03 Sun
Author: James
Subject: Re: What is Bush trying to hide?
In reply to: Captain America 's message, "What is Bush trying to hide?" on 15:26:15 03/09/03 Sun

We agree and disagree. we agree that open government is best. We disagree that allowing individuals/companies the opportunity to share their views in private means that you have something to hide. Just as a point of fact, many republicans actually did say that Cheney should release the names of the companies involved. I would not give the names up either after I had promised them confidenciality ( like many others in the past have done) but I would consider being the first person in history to brake the veil of secrecy and make as many of my future meetings public.


> All elected officials should be judged by the same
>standard. I think that Clinton abused his office by
>claiming executive privilege in cases where it was
>clearly inappropriate. And yes, Hillary should have
>been more open about how she was formulating her
>health care plans. (Isn't it interesting that the
>Republicans who were so upset about that are silent
>now!)
>
>I also think that Dean was wrong to put so many of his
>official papers out of the public's view.
>
>The fact remains ... White House should turn over
>documents pertaining to the formulation
>Administration's energy policy. Who was involved?
>Who was consulted? What were the interests of the
>consultants? How much did these consultants give to
>Bush's campaign fund? Was the public interest being
>served? If so, why not show them how?
>
>What is Bush trying to hide?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.