VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22:16:42 01/06/03 Mon
Author: Robert
Subject: Correction...
In reply to: Robert 's message, "PARENTAL NOTIFICATION: Vermont law does not require it, and Fed law forbids it" on 22:12:05 01/06/03 Mon

Actually, the Fed funding law that requires providers of "reproductive health services" be confidential and NOT notify family (read parents!) is something called "Title X."

The thing to do is find out what Vermont State Reps sponsored efforts for a State law for parental notification of abortion.

I believe Vermont State Representative Nancy Sheltra and Vermont State Senator Mark Shephard could provide anyone concerned about this issue with info & updates.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.