VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:57:19 12/27/02 Fri
Author: Jane Hamilton
Subject: Again, read what the court has written
In reply to: Leland Gaunt 's message, "Re: Democrat Liberals Still Don't Get It" on 12:47:06 12/27/02 Fri

I stand by the Second Amendment. And I agree with the U.S. Supreme Court when they say that there is no Constitutionally protected individual right to gun ownership. Do some reading. Lewis v U.S.; U.S. v Miller; Cases v U.S.

But we have discussed this. There is not much point in pursuing it if you refuse to acknowledge what the law says according to the high court.

I will add, however, that I am a gun owner and I believe that individuals should be able to own guns. I just wish that the NRA would invest more in promoting responsible gun ownership.

>
> Well then; Jane. You do not expect us to change our
>core values, right? Just because the Democrats do not
>have the guts and determination to stand by the Second
>Amendment of the United States Constitution?
> There are some Democrats that stand by Constitutional
>principles. Two come to mind. Congressman John Dingell
>(D)-15th District Michigan. He is on the Board of
>Directors of the National Rifle Association. A second
>is Congressman Joe Baca (D)-San Bernardino,
>California. He is very pro-gun and votes for his own
>set of principles. These gentlemen are not mere lap
>dummies of the anti-gun radical agenda laid out by the
>likes of Hillary Clinton, Charles Schumer, Jack Reed,
>Frank Lautenberg and the often "intoxicated" Sen.
>Teddy from your neighboring state of Massachuttes.
> In truth we will not give up our core values. Keep
>going the way your going and prepare to loose more
>elections. It's no skin off my nose, however!
>
> Leland

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.