Port pollution -- Fan Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

Subject: Port pollution

Author:
nugget

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 17:36:05 03/15/04 Mon

It might appear that the rumblings about ports success this year could ring true. Talk about premature evaluation, they're going overboard because they beat Gerringong and are beating their drum because they beat an under strengthed steelers Flegg side but are remarkably silent when they got flogged in the country challenge. Ports president had the hide to say that they were only treating it as a trial. Whilst I'm on the subject of Port why don't you give Lulia Lulia back to Berkeley you mongrels. Don't give me all that horse shit that he wanted to play with you, any kid would capitulate if they had walshy and Crossy putting pressure on him . Yet another disgraceful episode by the blacks and the Illawarra management who should have had the guts to veto it. I hope you get what you deserve.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: Port pollution	Rick	01:18:50 03/21/04 Sun