Barbara -- Jesus Army Watch Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21/05/10 7:02:54pm
Author: Peter Eveleigh
Subject: Barbara
In reply to: Barbara 's message, "Peter" on 21/05/10 6:47:15pm

>I NEVER called you a paedophile and you know darned
>well I didn't.
>
>I do think you have been brainwashed by Common Purpose
>though.

Barbara, I never said you did call me a paedophile.

You think I am working as a CP stooge (supporting a corrupt organisation, which you think supports institutional child abuse). That is a pretty serious allegation to make against a teacher.

Maybe you didn't mean it to be offensive?

We have talked about this before, and maybe, just maybe you have it in you to accept that when I make child protection referrals, I do it with the best interests of the child in mind. You don't have to like me to give me that much.

I will give you the possibility that you don't recognise just how offensive your accusation is.

For my own part, I am at home sick, so was too easily distracted by this. I work a bloody hard week and am worn down. I work with autistic children, some of them from very distressing backgrounds...and it takes its toll, which is maybe why your attack was more hurtful.

You may not believe me, but I don't hate you and I am not against the victims of child abuse. I certainly do not pick on you because of it. I genuinely do it for reasons I have given too many times already today.

It would wind me up no end if what you had just written about freemasons killing your friend's brother had appeared at the start of the day (incl a link), but bygones...

I am sorry you think that I persecute you because of who you are and that it makes you angry enough to say the things you said, so I am sorry I made you unhappy today.

(won't be able to respond to anything more tonight as going out now, so not ignoring any response)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Autism -- Barbara, 21/05/10 7:38:45pm
- Re: Autism -- Peter Eveleigh, 21/05/10 11:36:45pm
  - Re: Autism -- Barbara, 22/05/10 2:38:00pm
    - Re: Autism -- Peter Eveleigh, 22/05/10 9:53:04pm
      - exhausted from a glorious day's flying, thus the typos -- Peter Eveleigh, 22/05/10 9:56:54pm
        Re: exhausted from a glorious day's flying, thus the typos -- Peter, 23/05/10 12:48:17pm
      - Re: Autism -- Barbara, 24/05/10 11:43:59am
        Re: Autism -- Peter Eveleigh, 24/05/10 5:24:36pm
        Bullies ALWAYS get their just rewards -- Barbara, 24/05/10 7:29:01pm
        Re: Bullies ALWAYS get their just rewards -- Anon (Turn the other cheek), 24/05/10 10:53:07pm
Re: Barbara -- Peter Eveleigh, 24/05/10 7:05:46pm
- Re: Barbara -- Barbara, 24/05/10 7:44:28pm
  - MEN FOR JESUS -- Barbara, 24/05/10 7:47:29pm
    - Re: MEN FOR JESUS -- the artist formerly known as anon., 24/05/10 8:49:44pm
  - Re: Barbara -- the artist formerly known as anon., 24/05/10 8:52:21pm
    - Re: Barbara -- Peter Eveleigh, 24/05/10 9:39:06pm
      - Re: Barbara -- the artist formerly known as anon., 24/05/10 9:45:37pm
        the lesser of two evils! -- Peter Eveleigh, 24/05/10 10:32:25pm
        Re: the lesser of two evils! -- Anon, 24/05/10 10:57:24pm
        Re: the lesser of two evils! -- Peter Eveleigh, 24/05/10 11:03:05pm
        Re: the lesser of two evils! -- Anon, 24/05/10 11:13:54pm
        Re: the lesser of two evils! -- Peter Eveleigh, 24/05/10 11:39:01pm
        Re: the lesser of two evils! -- the artist formerly known as anon., 25/05/10 9:51:22am
        Re: the lesser of two evils! -- Anon, 25/05/10 9:59:18am

[ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
Message subject (required):

Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>>I NEVER called you a paedophile and you know darned >>well I didn't. >> >>I do think you have been brainwashed by Common Purpose >>though. > > >Barbara, I never said you did call me a paedophile. > >You think I am working as a CP stooge (supporting a >corrupt organisation, which you think supports >institutional child abuse). That is a pretty serious >allegation to make against a teacher. > >Maybe you didn't mean it to be offensive? > >We have talked about this before, and maybe, just >maybe you have it in you to accept that when I make >child protection referrals, I do it with the best >interests of the child in mind. You don't have to like >me to give me that much. > >I will give you the possibility that you don't >recognise just how offensive your accusation is. > >For my own part, I am at home sick, so was too easily >distracted by this. I work a bloody hard week and am >worn down. I work with autistic children, some of them >from very distressing backgrounds...and it takes its >toll, which is maybe why your attack was more hurtful. > >You may not believe me, but I don't hate you and I am >not against the victims of child abuse. I certainly do >not pick on you because of it. I genuinely do it for >reasons I have given too many times already today. > >It would wind me up no end if what you had just >written about freemasons killing your friend's brother >had appeared at the start of the day (incl a link), >but bygones... > >I am sorry you think that I persecute you because of >who you are and that it makes you angry enough to say >the things you said, so I am sorry I made you unhappy >today. > >(won't be able to respond to anything more tonight as >going out now, so not ignoring any response)
Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.