Re: Universe -- Vapaan keskustelun foorumi

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 05:35:53 11/24/00 Fri
Author: EE
Subject: Re: Universe
In reply to: Jade 's message, "Re: Universe" on 08:01:07 11/23/00 Thu

(heit�n viel� t�m�n eilen kirjoitetun kommentin jota voy ei
jostain syyst� suostunut vastaanottamaan)

> Minusta taas ��ret�n muulla kuin abstraktin ajattelun
> tasolla olevana k�sitteen� tuntuu mahdottomalta. Jos
> materia on ��rellinen niin tilankin on oltava ��rellinen
> - neh�n menev�t k�si k�dess�.

Ei minusta. Kyll� tilaa voi olla vaikka aine ei sit�
kokonaan t�ytt�isik��n. Jos jokin kappale etenee
��rellisess� avaruudessa, jossain vaiheessa (jos aikaa on
riitt�v�sti) se tulee tilan ��reen (reunaan) eik� voi en��
edet� sit� pidemm�lle. Minulle t�m� on k�sitt�m�tt�m�mpi
asia kuin (tyhj�n) tilan reunattomuus.

> Samoin kuinka jo valmiiksi
> ��ret�n (universumi) voisi laajeta? K�sitteellinen
> mahdottomuus.

Ainakaan matematiikassa ��ret�n ei ole mik��n vakioksi
m��ritelty maksimi johon ei voi en�� lis�t� mit��n. ��ret�n
+ ��ret�n = ��ret�n, ��ret�n - ��ret�n = ��ret�n (ei nolla).

> Aika on alkanut hetkell� jolla universumi on syntynyt
> (aika on alkanut hetken� jolloin aika on alkanut) joten
> kysymys "mit� on ennen universumin synty�" on saman
> tason kysymys kuin "mit� on ennen aikaa". T�t� tarkoitin.

N�in oletinkin, eli ymm�rsin pointtisi.

> PS. Muutan sen kellon oikeaan aikaan kun ehdin.

OK, tack! :)

EE

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Universe -- Jade, 09:47:16 11/24/00 Fri

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-2
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.