VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4]5 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 01:33:01 10/14/02 Mon
Author: 君臨
Subject: 小魚你看錯了
In reply to: ~小魚 's message, "為君臨說點話" on 22:56:47 10/13/02 Sun

我由始至終都只想和大家分享這個遊戲,
但有人不滿我之前的詩論,
當時未有異議,如今卻認定
"我自創題目考你們,一副高高在上不可一世的樣子"
觸怒了他們,殊不知我從未立心不良,
只是轉貼,他們一再相逼反令自己陷入僵局.
(從留言可見,你們誤會我是作者,一直針對的是我.)
我並不氣憤,因為一切爭端是他們自以為是引起的,
受的也是他們.
不過,我還是對留真名的人士鼓掌,包括對手.



>一個普通的思辯問題引來熱烈的評論, 君臨應該高興才是.
>
>其實問題只是一個假設,
>說成閉門造車似乎太誇張(我的前話收回).
>不過不閉門又怎能造車? 我認為故事互不太荒謬,
>只是將現實社會幾種不同價值觀的人重疊在一個處境中.
>我相信問題的原作者是有誠意的.
>
>我以前在其他討論版上看過多次類似話題,
>人們多是乖乖作答和等待答案, 當是一般心理測試,
>未有像這裡的激辯. 畢竟, 如果認為一個假設不成立的話,
>便不能討論下去, 最後只有離題一途.
>比如大衛高柏威要表演魔術,
>有人說"他所做的只不過是掩眼法, 有甚麼好看",
>不是很掃興嗎?
>
>現今大學生原來比較愛辯證, 反思能力高, 這是值得高興.
>可惜還是不夠客觀, 未有理解提問者的用意,
>討論時用詞也有點不禮貌.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.