VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 06:45:26 10/15/02 Tue
Author: 癲左的符瑋
Subject: 也扮哂嚴肅
In reply to: 橾 's message, "嶒趼ㄛ潭娗喃媼cㄛ燊黺莮" on 22:36:18 10/14/02 Mon

小鄧的分析其實無乜特別激(其實都聽左好多次啦)，老陳感到煩想必係因為無端又整到"資本主義"的頭上。老實講，作一個歷史考掘，所謂"資本主義"，與其話係一個用來解釋的"因"，不如作為一個粗略的分類label, 因為所謂資本主義，是用來形容各種在宣稱自由經濟體系下社會的運作的"假設性"概念。這種"倒果為因"卻正正是我們日常語言和生活的重要部份，也是人類所應突破的一種界限。

老陳其實亦不必太介意，你沒留意嗎？不論東方西方佛學社會學，大家都受語言的魔障所迷(guliguli~yeah)。這就是人類，不必太執了。

話時話，小鄧的作品邊度可以睇到？搵日寄本"腥紅熱"和近作"小門集"過你，正統過拉登式的元教旨主義架。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.