VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22:36:18 10/14/02 Mon
Author: 老陳
Subject: 錯字，兼補充二點，關於讀詩
In reply to: ρ朝 's message, "癚阶腨德翴" on 22:09:31 10/14/02 Mon

文中談到拿綜緩是否懶人，其中一句應為: 「先」不論有多少人以偏蓋全...

另，不想太離本版主題，補充關於讀詩二點:
1. 老陳曾在此因一首貓詩沒有用上反讀法而誤讀作者，有損作者是罪過，sorrysorry, 而從正讀法進化到用反讀法那是一種進化，恰以為例。是次用錯讀法，老陳並不尷尬，即使明知是錯，老陳也會從基本問起，中學生沒理由計唔到小學生的數學功課，那是老陳學問的基本態度。

2. 關於老陳的讀詩觀，我相信必定曾有過類似文學理論，絕不是老陳自己發明的，不過無暇尋出處，至於該類理論是否已被淘汰，還望高人指點。老陳深信生活能驗証理論而不一定要跟從理論，因為理論的執行有太多容易出錯的空間。如基本法第廿三條，一個大義凛然的理論下是一堆剝奪民生自由平等人權的執行細節，作為一個求學的人，你能不討厭這些空泛的理論嗎?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.