VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345 ]
Subject: BTW larry....


Author:
sci guy
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 15:37:11 01/15/08 Tue
In reply to: sci guy 's message, "so sad... you're still a'feared of cfl????" on 22:40:01 01/09/08 Wed

what do you do about the mercury in your thermostats? There's a LOT more mercury in a single one than you'll ever find in a whole house of CFLs


>Compared to incandescent lamps of the same luminous
>flux, CFLs use less energy and have a longer rated
>life. In the United States, a CFL can save over 30 USD
>in electricity costs over the lamp's lifetime compared
>to an incandescent lamp and save 2000 times their own
>weight in greenhouse gases.[2] The purchase price of a
>CFL is higher than that of an incandescent lamp of the
>same luminous output, but this cost is recovered in
>energy savings and replacement costs over the bulb's
>lifetime.
>
>
>
>
>A June 2007 article calculated that the overall
>mercury emission by CFLs is less than the mercury
>released into the atmosphere by coal-fired power
>generation for series of equivalent incandescent lamps
>over the same period.[37] Of course, not all
>electricity is coal-fire generated, but the mercury
>from spent CFLs in landfills is not released into air,
>and with proper disposal, will not be released into
>the subsurface or groundwater in the foreseeable
>future.
>
>
> >href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_flourescent"
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_flourescent

>>run hide the new enviro danger just poped up. send in
>>your cash we need to fund a new way to recycle the
>>bulbs in a safe maner. send cash now. visa and master
>>card welcome.
>>
>>Less than a month after the U.S. Congress passed an
>>energy bill banning the incandescent light bulb by
>>2014, the UK Environment Agency issued guidelines
>>calling for evacuation of any room where an
>>energy-saving compact fluorescent light bulb is
>>broken, releasing toxic mercury.
>>
>>The warning comes a month before the British
>>government begins its phase-out of tungsten bulbs,
>>scheduled to be completed in 2011. The switchover to
>>CFL bulbs will save at least five million tons of
>>carbon dioxide emissions every year, the government
>>said.
>>
>>Health experts warned this week that people with
>>certain skin ailments will suffer from the new
>>eco-friendly bulbs which cause conditions such as
>>eczema to flare up. Additionally, the bulbs have been
>>linked to migraine headaches in some people.
>>
>>The Environment Agency's latest advice focuses on the
>>6 to 8 milligrams of toxic mercury in each bulb.
>>
>>Users who break a bulb should vacate the room for at
>>least 15 minutes, the new guidelines say. The debris
>>should not be removed with a vacuum cleaner, which
>>could put toxic dust into the air, but with rubber
>>gloves. The broken glass and all residue is to be
>>placed into a sealed plastic bag and taken to a local
>>official recycling site for proper disposal.
>>
>>"Because these light bulbs contain small amounts of
>>mercury, they could cause a problem if disposed of in
>>a normal bin," environmental scientist Dr David
>>Spurgeon told the London Daily Mail.
>>
>>"It is possible that the mercury could be released
>>into the air or from land-fill when they are released
>>into the wider environment. That is a concern, because
>>mercury is a well-known toxic substance."
>>
>>The Environmental Agency noted that neither warnings
>>about the bulbs' toxicity nor directions for proper
>>disposal is printed on any packaging.
>>
>>Such warnings aren't necessary, said one toxicologist
>>who said a number of bulbs would have to be smashed
>>simultaneously before there was a danger.
>>
>>"Mercury accumulates in the body – especially the
>>brain," Dr. David Ray, from the University of
>>Nottingham, told the BBC. "The biggest danger is
>>repeated exposure – a one off exposure is not as
>>potentially dangerous compared to working in a light
>>bulb factory.
>>
>>"If you smash one bulb then that is not too much of a
>>hazard. However, if you broke five bulbs in a small
>>unventilated room then you might be in short term
>>danger."
>>
>>The most-immediate hazard from the CFL bulbs may be to
>>Brits' pocketbooks. It costs about $1,300 to properly
>>dispose of one municipal recycling bin full of bulbs –
>>a figure that is sure to increase residents' tax bills

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
I take the mercury switches out andDE03:47:45 01/16/08 Wed
Re: BTW larry....larry03:03:24 01/19/08 Sat


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.