Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

Subject: Re: Naming and shaming Author: Ian [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 17:04:51 10/20/03 Mon In reply to: Karen 's message, "Re: Naming and shaming" on 16:54:19 10/20/03 Mon Sorry I am not arguing for a rule change to allow it, there is no subjective test for an A jive couple form one uni or another (big or small) being bad at wlatz, and being sufficiently bad that they should be allowed. The point I am making, rather badly it seems, is that in practice people don't object if it doesn't make a big difference. If you cheat and get a long way, they will do. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]