Re: Naming and shaming -- universitydancesport.com forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

Subject: Re: Naming and shaming

Author:
Karen

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:54:19 10/20/03 Mon
In reply to: Robin 's message, "Re: Naming and shaming" on 16:28:58 10/20/03 Mon

>PS similarly, if you think xyz-small-uni A-jive should
>not have to do open A-tango, then the rules should
>have some provision for that (e.g. SC decides on
>application).

I am in full agreement with Robin and would like to ask, on the above, why there should be a difference between smaller and bigger unis as concerns the opposite discipline opens? I don't think being at Oxford/Cambridge/anywhere else with a big team necessarily means that an A-Jiver would be amazing at foxtrot. Surely noone thinks that, especially at the beginning of the year (Oxford Team have their first lessons at the earliest on Friday night this week), by Warwick, the new Oxford A Team will all be brill at their opposite discipline open dance (especially if it's not even a team dance).

This rule isn't gonna affect me personally, if i may add, as I'll not be A-Jive/Cha/anything, so I am actually trying to make a general point and not bend any rules.

There shouldn't be any discussion about smaller or bigger unis here, but the committee responsible should fix a rule and write it down for people to adhere to that rather than guess what things mean.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: Naming and shaming	Ian	17:04:51 10/20/03 Mon