Re: Nottingham Competition -- universitydancesport.com forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

Subject: Re: Nottingham Competition

Author:
Di

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 05:29:35 10/31/03 Fri
In reply to: Tina 's message, "Re: Nottingham Competition" on 21:18:59 10/29/03 Wed

Personally I don't see why they shouldn't. After all, it's 2 different routines. And there are enough Waltzes out there that they don't have to play the same music for both!

>I've looked at the Nottingham website as well. I agree
>that they should have an Open Quickstep instead. They
>are having Basic Cha and Open Jive, which is a
>different dance in both Basic and Open. But why are
>they having both Waltz in Basic and Open? Shouldn't it
>be a Basic Waltz and Open Quickstep or vice versa?
>
>>I had a look at the nottingham website about the
>>competition, I just want to know that why are they
>>doing both Basic and Open Waltz, why not going basic
>>or Open Waltz and Quicksteps in the other?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]