Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

Subject: Re: suda constitution Author: Shell [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 14:34:21 11/03/03 Mon In reply to: Ali 's message, "Re: suda constitution" on 14:30:30 11/03/03 Mon >On seconds thought, why can't we apply to the IVDA SC >for arbitration on a SUDA-only matter? Provided we >have a solid const this should be fine (obvisouly >excepting on-the-day problems). On the day problems are the ones that I was trying to cover by permitting the SUDA President/executive committee the power to interpret the rules, advised by any IVDA SC people that may be present. shell xxx [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Re: suda constitution Alice 18:52:30 11/03/03 Mon