Re: suda constitution -- universitydancesport.com forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

Subject: Re: suda constitution

Author:
Ali

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:39:11 11/03/03 Mon
In reply to: Alice 's message, "Re: suda constitution" on 12:44:39 11/03/03 Mon

On seconds thought, why can't we apply to the IVDA SC for arbitration on a SUDA-only matter? Provided we have a solid const this should be fine (obvisouly excepting on-the-day problems).

1.4.1. The role of SUDA standing committee shall be fulfilled by the IVDA standing committee

1.4.2

1.4.3. For matters requiring an immediate
decision (e.g. 3.18.4), the SUDA executive committee
shall interpret the SUDA constitution as is
appropriate, advised by members of the IVDA standing
committee where possible

One niggly problem with using IVDASC is that of auditing - no-one ever submits their accounts for audit, and no-one ever cares, but even so...

>Added to the SUDA constitution.

I submitted to Caroline a complete and up-to-date version of the IVDA constitution. The one presently on the website has a number of errors, ommisions, and, most importantly, several clauses that have yet to be officially added and are awaiting a second vote - I'd advise against using it as a base. If I were you I'd wait for the revised version to appear on this website before I wrote the SUDA const (I can email it if you want).

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]