Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6 ]

Subject: Re: Should IMTM be run to compare it with new format Author: Paul J [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 13:22:45 10/15/03 Wed In reply to: Ian 's message, "Should IMTM be run to compare it with new format" on 15:32:13 10/14/03 Tue >I say TMTM is probably what IVDA will have for the >next few years (the last one lasted 40 years!), but >before we commit to it for ever, we should try the >only alternative still on the table! [ie IMTM] Perhaps I've completely lost track of the conversation, but in what way does IMTM differ from the system that we have used in recalling couples for the last 40-odd years? [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Re: Should IMTM be run to compare it with new format Ali 13:55:44 10/15/03 Wed