Re: Counter proposal -- universitydancesport.com forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6] ]

Subject: Re: Counter proposal

Author:
Tim

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:39:28 05/19/03 Mon
In reply to: Order 's message, "Re: Counter proposal" on 15:36:40 05/19/03 Mon

Oops! That last message was supposed to be titled 'order' not from 'order'. It was mine, in case you were wondering.

>Fair enough, though I remain in favour of Ali's whole
>proposal, minus this nonsense about amalgamation.
>
>As a matter of order, at the meeting on saturday all
>the various parts of Ali's proposal will be considered
>separately, and voted on separately as well. The
>proposal is too large and complex to suit a 'take it
>or leave it' single vote.
>
>Nonetheless, I recommend that people vote in favour of
>the whole original proposal. I have my doubts about
>the 'odds and sods' idea.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>Ali,
>>
>>This proposal is an alternative to your whole idea,
>>its not as radical, and solves some problems that your
>>solution doesn't, and admittedly doesn't solve some
>>things that you have suggested.
>>
>>The proposal is
>>status quo + allowance for weaker teams
>>OR status quo + allowance for weaker teams + team
>>marking and concordet.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]