Re: Meaningful Individual Results in Varsity (for mathmos only!) -- universitydancesport.com forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6] ]

Subject: Re: Meaningful Individual Results in Varsity (for mathmos only!)

Author:
Tim

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:55:30 05/22/03 Thu
In reply to: Justine 's message, "Re: Meaningful Individual Results in Varsity (for mathmos only!)" on 12:40:28 05/22/03 Thu

Conroversial, but I think I prefer them as well. Not as good technically, but more characterisation and charisma, in my opinion. That said, I don't understand how any judge could put them first in Samba or Jive, where B+C are clearly better.

>For example, if the top
>>UK latin couple AND Brian and Carmen were dancing for
>>Oxford (he he!) in different heats. They would both
>>beat the same number of cambridge couples (i.e. all of
>>them!), but that does not mean they are equally good.
>
>You're right, I prefer Paul & Hannah!! They've beaten
>B&C in all dances except jive, unfortunately not in
>the same comp.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]