VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Sun, 08/31/03 7:34pm
Author: OnB
Subject: Re: NDN religion
In reply to: Steve Russell 's message, "Re: NDN religion" on Sun, 08/31/03 4:22pm

>
>>That high school girl was probly lucky they din't
>>conduct a search and seizure of her premises for
>>illegal, non-certified,non-exempt feathers.
>>I guess I always thought that those big CONSTITUTION
>>RIGHTS were on the side of being inviolable- religion
>>being one of them.
>>I'm thinking if you can give all the cowboys in the
>>state of Texas the right to carry concealed
>>weapons,(yah, that's a crowd I wanna see secretly
>>packing...), one could certainly argue in favor of
>>letting the indigenies have their
>>feathers..............."I'm sorry sir, but you'll have
>>to come with me...that's a loaded feather you're
>>carrying in a public place." "Put your peyote
>>buttons on the floor and come out with your hands in
>>the air where I can see them!"
>>"Do you have a license for that sweetgrass? Or is this
>>a 1st class culinary misdemeanour......?"
>>
>>EEeeeeeeeeeeee! My brain is storming around over here
>>now, too!
>>dammit.
>
>You beg the question.
>
>There is no question that the First Amendment bans
>establishment of religion and guarantees free exercise
>of religion. The question is what do those two things
>mean?
>
>And, more important for what I am trying to air out
>here, do they mean something different for ndns than
>for other people?
>
>I was in Texas when concealed carry passed and was not
>too thrilled about it until I saw all the requirements
>for a license--then I didn't much care.
>
>There has been no crime wave as a result. The only
>homicides in public places by permit holders have been
>clear-cut self defense cases, which was the whole
>point of concealed carry.
>
>I think there has been one non-justified homicide by a
>permit holder, but that happened at home where the
>permit was irrelevant.
>
>Virtually all of the crimes by permit holders have
>been regulatory infractions.
>
>My verdict after over five years: concealed carry
>certainly did no harm and may have done some good.
>
>Steve


Well, I don't think I was really talking about the concealed carry thing so much as I was using it as a ridiculous example for comparison with the level of danger to be had at the business end of a loaded feather. And the ludicrous legislation that they're willing to pass for or against,(as the case may be),devolving upon personal agenda and special interest monies.

Oh well.
Feathers don't tickle.
People do.


:D
OnB

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.