| Subject: Re:i agreed with carmen's reply to stuart smith |
Author:
debbie
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 06:44:27 05/13/03 Tue
Author Host/IP: NoHost/134.83.1.225
In reply to:
Stuart-Smith LJ
's message, "People will be people...." on 11:20:51 02/06/03 Thu
after reading stuart's sad little comment i felt like i have to meet this person and find out what kind of life this person live, he talks like as if we are all losers to give our comment. but hey isnt it what he's doing on this page?
and to carmen, good for you on your comment replied to him.
hey stuart i think you ARE a Bloody loser, its sad of you to make those comment, dont forget the fact that people are here to comment on what they think. iam sure sometime yesterday you must look at some one one the street and said oh she look nice or oh my god that outfit look shit on her let olone your whole. hey speaking of which are you the contestant they comment about? tjat why you're sooooooooo angry?
>I generally hold my silence, but all these messages
>amuse me. Some of you defend, yet some of you attack
>these personalities without even an ounce of thought
>given to reason and logic. Miss Chinese International
>2003, Rachel Tan, may be 'fake', a bitch and
>materialistic, yet that begs the question, who isn't?
>At some point in our lives, we exhibit one, if not
>all, of those qualities.
>
>You people who are so adverse to the winner are so
>given to emotions and your ignorant prejudices that
>you forget (nor would I presume you have even the
>slightest idea of) what it takes to compete in an
>international pageant. I dare say those who are so
>vocal in their criticisms would run for cover, or
>crawl into their pathetic claustrophobic shells, when
>such an oppurtunity is offered to them. It is not easy
>to be speaking to a crowd, let alone an international
>audience. All that you people are courageous enough to
>do, is to speak behind the veil of anonymity of the
>internet.
>
>The contestants have their inadequacies, but they have
>qualities which most of us lack. Courage and the
>determination to succeed. They have in them, the drive
>to make a difference, in their lives and that of
>others. How they choose to exhibit it thus, is none of
>my business, neither should it be any of your concern.
>
>You prophesy (not spelt prophesize) who should be the
>winner. At this point I must say you must have not
>been very important, for I certainly do not see you
>included in the panel of judges. Bark all you want,
>for the results are final. I would not be too
>presumptious to believe, that the results of the
>pageant would not, in any way, ruin the goodwill
>shared between the contestants.
>
>So what if Toronto won? Or if Hong Kong won? Or any of
>the other contestants won? The only polite thing to
>do, is to offer one word. Congratulations. And to add
>nothing more.
>
>"Envy is never alone, spite always tag along."
>
>Think about it.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |
Feedback: 