Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct:
Feedback:
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ] |
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
Re: ~UNSUNG SAGA OF THE $25 MILLION DOLLAR GIANT LAVA LAMP~ -- No name, 17:26:28 12/01/02 Sun
WHERE DID THE 3 MILLION DOLLAR PROJECT FIGURE COME FROM? Spokesman Review reported on Brent Blake being vague about the cost. (Less than $10 million, but more than $3 million.) Better run that one by us again. $25 MILLION is what your applications reads. News reporters get a mixed version. The general public stands by with mouth gaping. The play-let goes on changing it's colors.
[ Edit | View ]
[> [> [>
Re: ~UNSUNG SAGA OF THE $25 MILLION DOLLAR GIANT LAVA LAMP~ -- Lava4now, 03:22:36 12/02/02 Mon
News media still useing 3 million cost factor as late as Monday, November 18, 2002? Blake's Wa-Cert application was dated Oct.01,02, cost says $25 Million. (re Washington Notebook. re Coumbian staff writer, Margaret Ellis. re ..LAVA LAMP TOUTED AS TOURIST DRAW), Monday, November 18, 2002. Article mentions the $3 million, 60-foot lava lamp that is expected to fill the empty storefronts in town.. according to "authorities". Gheez...what AUTHORITIES? And then came the shop-talk by George Sharp, CTED, whose byline is no less disturbing. Sharp indicated, No one else has one of these LAVA icons. George Sharp is tourism-development manager for the state of washington. Sharp spells out his own feelings. .... "one of the keys in marketing is to be there first". HELLO GEORGE! GIANT LAVA? CHICAGO? TRADEMARK? REGISTERED? Whose on first George?
|
Forum timezone: GMT-8 VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB: Before posting please read our privacy policy. VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems. Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved. |