Re: I am also genuinely curious- how exactly do you define masculinity? -- Boston Public Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:31:13 05/18/02 Sat
Author: Wakener
Subject: Re: I am also genuinely curious- how exactly do you define masculinity?
In reply to: Hobsonphile 's message, "I am also genuinely curious- how exactly do you define masculinity?" on 00:50:39 05/09/02 Thu

A real man would be Woody Allen in the "Mirror, Mirror" universe.

>Because historically, a "real man" was defined as
>someone who had a strong work ethic, someone who
>understood the meaning of duty, and someone who
>treated women with kindness. Notice that this
>definition does not include physical strength, social
>confidence or sexual prowess. Many personalities fit
>into this framework, including Scott's. However
>"vulnerable" he may be in some situations, he stands
>up when it counts- whether it be to maintain his
>professional integrity (as he did countless times with
>Meredith), to stick up for honesty and principle
>(staring down that smarmy lawyer in defense of
>Harvey), or to defend a more traditional pedagogy that
>values strict standards of academic achievement and
>behavior (a pedagogy to which our schools desperately
>need to return IMO). I see nothing that is less than
>masculine in this character- unless of course one
>defines masculinity in terms of a love of sports and
>an ability to engage in locker room bull sessions.
>
>Steph

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Woody Allen? Ew. (NT) -- Hobsonphile, 02:50:09 05/19/02 Sun