appeasement -- Modern World History GCSE Revision

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 17:27:33 12/09/02 Mon
Author: vimtosmiler
Subject: appeasement

i think that cahmberlain was right to appease, if he hadnt would we have been prepared for war? no we would have been defeated. we needed the time to build our defences and our army. what chamberlain did was enable us to get ready for war, how can you say that chamberlain was a poo prime minister? he won our war!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

appeasment -- chicken flavoured snow, 18:45:59 12/09/02 Mon
appeasement -- funkii_bunii, 20:48:18 12/09/02 Mon
appeasment -- Theoutlander02, 21:42:56 12/09/02 Mon
- well dun outlander -- Fred Flintsone jnr., 22:08:28 12/09/02 Mon
  - Thankyou Fred Flintstone jnr! -- Theoutlander02, 22:19:17 12/09/02 Mon

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.