VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:42:19 06/18/01 Mon
Author: Hodgy
Subject: Re: Gramps vs. Tim
In reply to: timothy hole 's message, "Re: Gramps vs. Tim" on 10:53:04 06/18/01 Mon

I do read Tim, but nothing philosophical and i have heard of Sartre but never read any. However, I dont pick up these words like you do. Anyway that wasn't my point. What i was trying to say was that both you and gramps made convincing arguements without using complex, obscure words, which i felt was more effective and "accessible".
Even if they know what big words mean people feel intimidated by them and stop paying attention to what is being said.
Does anyone else think the same way?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.