VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4]567 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Tue, December 23 2003, 10:10:13
Author: Peter van der Hoog
Subject: Re: Serious analysis?
In reply to: Todd 's message, "Serious analysis?" on Tue, December 23 2003, 9:37:11

>Maybe I'll write a more detailed comment, but when I
>show all the mistakes myself, there will be no
>discussion.

OK, place it in the newsgroup like you suggested and I then add my comment in a reaction. That's then a good start of the discussion.

But wait with publishing the link. We (Katerine and I) are perfectionists, and there are still a few mistakes we want to correct. Anyway there is no need to hurry. The orignal article was published more then a year ago

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.