Inaccuracy or juggling? -- Flambers Drugstore

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Wed, February 19 2003, 3:39:04
Author: Todd
Subject: Inaccuracy or juggling?
In reply to: Margaret 's message, "Inaccuracy, but...." on Tue, February 18 2003, 15:25:14

You and Peter are too gullible. The authors told the story of Regina. But why are the facts given without any reference: the exact quote, the exact number of page and why do they contradict to the facts of the first article? Inaccuracy? Maybe. And when they said that Gerhard Fischer had not been allowed to enter the USA it was not inaccuracy, it was a lie. If they lied one time, they could also lie about the content of those letters. The more I think about it the more suspicious the whole story seems to me.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Inaccuracy or juggling? -- Peter van der Hoog, Wed, February 19 2003, 8:15:56
- It were the same journalists of the same newspaper! -- Todd, Wed, February 19 2003, 9:09:30
  - OK, they are -- Peter van der Hoog, Wed, February 19 2003, 17:57:21
    - Believe or not believe, that is the question -- Katerina, Thu, February 20 2003, 3:23:06
    - Contact Peter Nicholas? Yes, I think about it! -- Todd, Thu, February 20 2003, 6:31:40
      - Re: Contact Peter Nicholas? Yes, I think about it! -- Peter van der Hoog, Thu, February 20 2003, 16:45:13
        You taught me to be a bore, Peter! -- Todd, Fri, February 21 2003, 4:25:44
        Don't flatter me, Todd! -- Peter van der Hoog, Fri, February 21 2003, 5:02:14
        Re: Don't flatter me, Todd! -- Todd, Fri, February 21 2003, 5:57:22
        No special questions -- Margaret, Fri, February 21 2003, 14:41:19
        Three versions -- Todd, Sat, February 22 2003, 7:32:21
        The first or the second ones -- Margaret, Sun, February 23 2003, 13:39:14
      - A dictionary for reading between the lines -- Margaret, Thu, February 20 2003, 21:41:48
- Did not you read the original of the first article? -- Todd, Wed, February 19 2003, 9:50:08
Re: Inaccuracy or juggling? -- Margaret, Wed, February 19 2003, 14:30:05