Re: as I am searching for the truth myself.... -- Flambers Drugstore

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Wed, January 08 2003, 12:18:58
Author: Peter van der Hoog
Subject: Re: as I am searching for the truth myself....
In reply to: Margaret 's message, "Re: as I am searching for the truth myself...." on Tue, January 07 2003, 13:56:26

>Yeah, I see. I see how the humour appeared in these words: when writing them you
were serious.

I tell you for the hundredth time: I was not serious. The style is over the top, over-emotional, it�s a copy of your style. You should know by now I�m not like that.

>Why not call a spade a spade?(Poruchik, no comments please!)

Poruchik, please comment. Why should you not comment?

>I said �no� and that was enough!

You said �no� a million times and we repeated that a million times. It�s the main subject of our discussion.

>I�ll tell you.... but a bit later. My searching for the truth is not finished yet.

You are like those people who try to make out of nothing something exciting. The truth is simple and boring: I want to know if you really married BF. No, I�m not a journalist and no, I�m not from the KGB. I�m an ordinary guy with a hang up if you are telling the truth.

>You are so funny! No idea what book you mean but how could you learn �much
more� not saving my answers and forgetting them in a few days? It is like to pour
water in a holed barrel and then complaint that you can�t fill it.

You are getting nasty. I already admitted that I have a bad memory. No need to rub it in. The information you gave about Regina was one of the exceptions, where you did give some information. You even forgot it yourself. When I really was convinced you married BF, I would never ask such questions. With my girlfriend I hardly ever discuss previous relationships, it�s not taboo but it�s also not a favourite subject. That makes me wonder. Your second husband wrote a book about his wife�s first marriage and recorded details my girlfriend would never share with me. When you want to describe such a marriage you get personal involved. I tell you, when I would start a relationship with a woman I would never volunteer to write a book about her previous marriage.

>>Then you have to admit we were very unsuccessful
See above.

I don�t see anything relevant above.

>I knew that you wouldn�t like it. But it was so tempting to catch you in a little trap
and then to look at your reaction.

Your traps are � I wanted to write �pathetic�, but let�s say �sweet�.

>Sure, sure. You think I don�t remember who discussed doubles a week ago?

Doubles? Sorry, I have no idea what you are talking about.

>It's a caricature and caricatures always exaggerate funny features.

Ok, but you don�t recognize anything in the �feet ahead� description?

>He may have refused because your sister did not work there.

You got it.

>Was the mistake occasional or deliberate?

You must have noticed that I changed my email address from AltaVista to Yahoo. All the mails from AltaVista I lost. I must have thought that the mails you (or Todd) referred to were from the AltaVista account.

>When you invite home your friends or relatives, when do they stay? Must be in the
streets when it is not too cold, don�t they?

You mean Regina stayed at your parents� home?

>Take it easy: it means that the questions were not important!

Finding out if you really married BF is not important. But I have to follow that road.

>How many books do you have about Rzeszewski, Alekhine, Keres, Spasski, Kasparov,
Petrosian?

None. I have one about Timman, one about Karpov and two (very recently!) about Fischer.

>>When it�s the reason I think it is then I don�t see a
>>difference with the way we are communicating now.
>Don�t see? I�m worried, Peter: are your eyes in a good order?!

Don�t worry; my eyes are in good order. But I did not want to get too explicit. Todd is also reading this conversation.

>That is right that you�re afraid of it: I already misunderstand you. Oh, rather, don�t
understand you at all.

That makes it all so exiting!

>>How about your problem?
>>Don�t you want to discus that?
>With you???

Yes, with me. Who else?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Ah? You need my comments? -- Todd, yawning, Thu, January 09 2003, 2:34:09
- Re: Ah? You need my comments? -- Peter van der Hoog, Thu, January 09 2003, 5:19:44
  - Re: Ah? You need my comments? -- Margaret, Thu, January 09 2003, 13:50:14
  - You asked for my opinion and I honestly said what I thought. -- Todd, Fri, January 10 2003, 2:42:02
    - Re: You asked for my opinion and I honestly said what I thought. -- Peter van der Hoog, Fri, January 10 2003, 7:24:08
      - I did not label you as boring, I called yer message boring -- Todd, Fri, January 10 2003, 9:00:07
      - Re: You asked for my opinion and I honestly said what I thought. -- Margaret, Sat, January 11 2003, 13:50:12
Something exciting from nothing? -- Margaret, Thu, January 09 2003, 13:55:30