Something exciting from nothing? -- Flambers Drugstore

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Thu, January 09 2003, 13:55:30
Author: Margaret
Subject: Something exciting from nothing?
In reply to: Peter van der Hoog 's message, "Re: as I am searching for the truth myself...." on Wed, January 08 2003, 12:18:58

>I tell you for the hundredth time: I was not serious.
>The style is over the top, over-emotional, it�s a copy
>of your style. You should know by now I�m not like
>that.

And not like this, are you?
No, that does not comfort me at all. I have a problem myself. No health problem
this time, quit smoking paid of. No, it�s something else. I wish I could get it of my
chest.

Why not call a spade a spade?(Poruchik, no comments
>please!)
>>Poruchik, please comment. Why should you not comment?

Don't you think that Poruchik's last comment about 'call a spade a spade' sim months ago was a bit vulgar?

>You are like those people who try to make out of
>nothing something exciting.

Nothing exciting, only some additional details.

The truth is simple and
>boring: I want to know if you really married BF.

The truth is simple, but details are very interesting. At least for me.

No,
>I�m not a journalist and no, I�m not from the KGB.

Since when have you been taking my jokes literally, Pete? Where is your famous
sense of humor you're so proud of?

I�m
>an ordinary guy with a hang up if you are telling the
>truth.

You are an ordinary guy with a mania.

>You are getting nasty.

Yeah, I know. Didn't I tell you: wanna people to get nice with you, treat them nice? As simple as that.

I already admitted that I have
>a bad memory. No need to rub it in. The information
>you gave about Regina was one of the exceptions, where
>you did give some information.

I really don�t get why being aware of your bad memory you did not even save any info
I gave you. I can�t find any logic in it.

You even forgot it
>yourself.

No wonder, I can't remember all what I wrote during these years.

When I really was convinced you married BF,
>I would never ask such questions. With my girlfriend I
>hardly ever discuss previous relationships, it�s not
>taboo but it�s also not a favourite subject. That
>makes me wonder. Your second husband wrote a book
>about his wife�s first marriage and recorded details
>my girlfriend would never share with me. When you want
>to describe such a marriage you get personal involved.
>I tell you, when I would start a relationship with a
>woman I would never volunteer to write a book
>about her previous marriage.

Sorry, but unlike you I ain't gonna discuss the details of my private live on public
forum anymore. Send your questions by email, please, and I�ll answer you....maybe.

>Your traps are � I wanted to write �pathetic�, but
>let�s say �sweet�.

When they are pathetic, why have you fallen in them?

>Doubles? Sorry, I have no idea what you are talking
>about.

'A double' is a well-known euphemism for 'a water-closet'. Strange that you never
heard of it.

>Ok, but you don�t recognize anything in the �feet
>ahead� description?

The KGB style can't have remained unrecognizable, Peter! And sure, when you're
writing an ordered article, a bit awkward walk of your subject(just think of it: the
main enemy of the Soviet chess school! If the enemy don't give up he is annihilated!)
is a good reason for making a laugh-stock of him.

>You must have noticed that I changed my email address
>from AltaVista to Yahoo. All the mails from AltaVista
>I lost. I must have thought that the mails you (or
>Todd) referred to were from the AltaVista account.

For the last time: I noticed, that in May you already changed your address to Yahoo.
In one of my letters from October I asked you bluntly, whether you fulfil your
promise from July,2. Your answer was: 'Sorry, I lost all my correspondence from
that time'. What should I think?

>You mean Regina stayed at your parents� home?

You got it.

>Finding out if you really married BF is not important.
>But I have to follow that road.

You seem unaware that you can�t follow that road alone.

>None. I have one about Timman, one about Karpov and
>two (very recently!) about Fischer.

Only four chess books? Why so few, Peter?

>Don�t worry; my eyes are in good order. But I did not
>want to get too explicit. Todd is also reading this
>conversation.

As you can see, Todd is not interested in our conversation at all. You even got
offended from him for such an attitude.

>That makes it all so exiting!

Something exciting from nothing?

>>How about your problem?
>Don�t you want to discus that?
>>With you???
>Yes, with me. Who else?

Why do you want do discus it?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]