VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Sun, January 26 2003, 7:10:16
Author: Katerina
Subject: Why is it violation of copyrights?
In reply to: Todd 's message, "It was not a free promotion, because Krabbe" on Fri, January 24 2003, 7:00:56

If Sloan placed the article of Krabbe without giving the link on his page and said that he had written the article himself, if would be violation of copyrights. But now it is not. The other thing is that the site of Sloan is pornographic and Krabbe did not tell about it.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

  • It's rather sick than funny -- Margaret, Mon, January 27 2003, 18:31:09
    Post a message:
    This forum requires an account to post.
    [ Create Account ]
    [ Login ]
    [ Contact Forum Admin ]

    Forum timezone: GMT-5
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.