Re: None of the above -- Flambers Drugstore

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Sat, February 08 2003, 14:51:30
Author: Margaret
Subject: Re: None of the above
In reply to: Katerina 's message, "Re: None of the above" on Fri, February 07 2003, 4:14:13

>Many women say that they are single but happy and
>don't want to lose their freedom. They have
>girl-friends and that is enough. I think that they
>want to have family but nobody wants to marry them and
>they just comfort themselves.

You're right, that's obvious.

>Yes, this girl is rather naive, but she is only 22.

She is already 22, it's the age of a mature person. I still think that her speculations are too naive and
infantile for such and age. Maybe it is because of the lack of a life experience.

>But to have children after 30 is not good for women.

.....as well as under 17. And not only because of physiology.

>The best age for giving birth is from 22 to 28 years.

In general the most favourable age for having the first child is from 19 to 27-28.

>14 years is too early for marriage, but at the age of
>16-17 it is possible.

Sometimes it is possible for girls if they are psychologically ready to get married, but just imagine a boy of 16-17 years of age as a husband or
moreover as a father. Ridiculous!

If the parents can support a
>young couple, it is not bad at all.

I hated it when I had to take money from my parents. They sure couldn't refuse me, but it
was not that nice to depend on them so much when having a family of my own.

First the parents
>help their children and when the parents get old the
>children will help them.

Not all the parents can help their children even if they want to do that.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]