Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

Subject: Re: The Resolution was #20 Author: Mike Redmond [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 14:24:31 02/24/03 Mon Author Host/IP: NoHost/209.17.158.14 In reply to: Roger 's message, "The Resolution was #20" on 23:41:53 02/23/03 Sun Resolution 20 merely provided a means by which the party could revoke the membership of anyone who didn't actively support the Aims and Principles of the party. Since David Orchard ran for the PC party in 2000 and presumably supported the party platform, I don't see how this resolution could have been construed as aiming at him. Surely it was more clearly aimed at those like Brian Pallister, who run for other parties against our candidates, while holding memberships in our party? Anyway, the will of the majority of the delegates was clearly not to get into this debate over how to strip someone of their membership, or where to draw the line on dissent within our party. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Re: The Resolution was #20 Roger 11:52:49 02/25/03 Tue Re: The Resolution was #20 -- Mike Redmond, 14:09:06 02/25/03 Tue Re: The Resolution was #20 -- Ariane, 20:41:30 02/25/03 Tue Re: The Resolution was #20 -- Roger, 14:11:09 02/26/03 Wed